Date: 2005-10-16 04:51 am (UTC)
With the general caveat of IT DEPENDS, I'd say that people basically know what's what at thirteen or fourteen (maybe fifteen for some). A young teenager can tell Schindler's List from Triumph of the Will.

I think the ratings system we have does an acceptable job of sorting movies and television into rough age-appropriate groups. But it works because a board of trained human beings makes the decision. They're able to watch a movie and say, "Yeah, okay, people get shot in the head, and you wouldn't want to bring a toddler to see it, but it's still different from a horror movie."

Things are less sophisticated in fandom, and on top of that there are a bunch of weepy types who will always read a story and go "I AM SQUICKED THERE SHOULD HAVE BEEN WARNINGS" no matter how well a difficult subject is dealt with.

Books don't have a ratings system. I don't think fanfic needs one either, although some content-sorting system would be useful; subject keywords in books work okay for this. I wouldn't mind seeing something like:

1. Cyclops -- Angst. 2. Sexual assault -- Hurt, Comfort. 3. Fiction.

This would let people avoid stuff they don't like, and it wouldn't have the moralistic overtones of a "rating", which always makes everyone puff up and bluster nicely. HOW DARE YOU SAY MPREG IS DEVIANT! IT SHOULDN'T BE NC-17 JUST BECAUSE THERE'S CANNIBALISM AND PEDOPHILIA! WHY I WHY I
This account has disabled anonymous posting.
If you don't have an account you can create one now.
HTML doesn't work in the subject.
More info about formatting

Profile

tocryabout: Martin Tielli, cover of Poppy Salesman album (Default)
F.A. MacNeil

October 2015

S M T W T F S
    123
4 5678910
11121314151617
18 1920 21222324
25262728293031

Style Credit

Page generated Dec. 25th, 2025 08:15 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags